Today & Tomorrow
separator line


Philip Wik




 

Faith and Doubt

 

      If I were to have a patron saint, it would have to be Thomas the Apostle. He is remembered for his incredulity when the other apostles announced Christ’s resurrection to him: “Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails and I put my finger into the place of the nails and put my hand into his side, I will not believe.” (John 20:25)  Eight days later, he made his act of faith.  “Because thou hast seen me, Thomas, thou has believed,” Jesus said.  “Blessed are they that have not seen, and have believed.”  (John 20:29)   In key points in your life, you will make choices.  Should I go to college or start a business?  Should I marry Lily or Suzy?  To discern between what is false and what is true will allow us to decide wisely.  But Pontius Pilate’s eternal question—what is truth?—lies at the crux of how to choose wisely and thusly how to live wisely.  I’ve met people who insist that we can know nothing absolutely; no truth is certain; all is relative.   We can never know for sure, they would say for example, that the earth goes around the sun.  On the other extreme is someone who insisted to me that space aliens (“greys”) repeatedly abducted her while being cradled in her mother’s arms.  (My youngest asked me today, “Is there such a thing as Loch Ness monsters?”  “No,” said I.  “They’re fables.”  Then Ben asked me, “Is there such a thing as a Permanent Record?”  “No,” I chuckled.  “That too is a fable.”)

       So here we have the full range of beliefs—from irrational skepticism to delusional credulity.  It’s indeed a paradox that the atheist who holds to the former joins hands with the theist who holds to the latter in their mutual incoherence.  As Eric Hoffer writes in The True Believer, “fanatics are ready to fly at each other’s throat.  But they are neighbors and almost of one family.  They hate each other with the hatred of brothers.  They are as far apart and close together as Saul and Paul.  It’s the fanatic and the moderate who are poles apart and never meet.” 

        What do we do?  Do we just throw our hands believing that nothing can be known?  Or do we on the other hand tolerate whatever nonsense popular culture throws at us—Bermuda triangles, astral projection, and aliens-among-us?   My answer is no-- to both extremes.  Truth is never a matter merely of faith or conviction.  Faith responds to truth.  Truth does not derive from faith.  Truth must be grounded in what is apart from what we believe.  “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.”   (Hebrews 11:1)  Those things hoped for and not seen must exist before there is faith.  They cannot be willed or hoped into existence.  Just because I believe to the contrary, it doesn’t mean that professional wrestling is real and the moon landings are fake.   “There are real things, whose character are entirely independent of our opinions about them,” the pragmatist philosopher Charles Pierce declared.  Human interests don’t determine truth.   And there are shades of truth, kinds of truth, and limits to reason.

         So how do we know what is true?  We start, as Thomas did, from a point—not of belief-- but of doubt.  And from that doubt comes inquiry, the exacting search for evidence, and the exercise of logic.  A theme in this book is that all of life conspires to trick us, to make us think that appearance is reality, that the shadow of things is the substance of things. 

        Doubt is especially important when it comes to foundational beliefs.  Cults find fertile soil in mysticism and irrationality precisely because such cults discourage critical thinking and tough-minded rationality with their fallacious appeals.  In the laboratory and the academia also, you must be ready. Someday, you may encounter a popular and smart teacher who eloquently bashes the “Xian myth.”  He may even take a special interest in you.  At such times in particular, you need to carefully weigh, think, and debate the issue through, and be prepared to disagree without being disagreeable.  This mental engagement is needed where ever any argument is made—from professors or the pulpit, the media or your friends, and even what you are reading right now.  Rationality and Christianity are not in opposition with each other, as the writings of C.S. Lewis and Thomas Aquinas attest. 

           My world was bright and fresh when I was a kid.  Those were days filled with questions.  But the years have passed, and now I find comfort in my well-worn prejudices.  It’s hard to summon the childlike curiosity and courage to challenge them.  But what if those prejudices lead me down a wrong path?   That’s a problem.  And that’s why I keep asking why.  “When I was a child, I spoke as a child,” as Paul writes.  As I grow, so to do my questions. So, to the question: why is the sky blue, I was happy with the answer that God made the sky that way.  Later, I found out that there was more to the answer--  that the short wave length of blue light causes it to get scattered by oxygen and nitrogen molecules than the longer wave lengths like red.  The latter answer expands on the first answer, but doesn’t invalidate it.  When my five-year old asks me why is there bad in the world, I’ll say that there is bad, but there’s also good, and that I love you and God loves you.  When he gets older, he’ll read about great men and women who also saw that there was bad, and decided to do something about it.  They became educators, scientists, and missionaries.  They made a difference because of the effort to learn, work, and lead.  But this starts with one simple word: why?  We cannot ask that word if we’re satisfied, when all of life is good.  So, when we doubt, we kindle the tiny flame of hope and a vision for something better.  This is why I say: Doubt is faith.  It’s another kind of belief, and it’s a positive affirmation.  Certitude is apostasy.  It’s a kind of spiritual death, as certitude breeds inertia, passivity, and hopelessness.    Even blasphemy depends on strong faith.  “If anyone doubts this,” G.K. Chesterton says, “let him sit down seriously and try to think blasphemous thoughts about Thor.  I think his family will find him in the end of the day in a state of exhaustion.”

 



separator line

Copyright © 2006 My Mall & News
About | Site Map | Archives | Home