The legal definition of common sense
is: “When a person possesses those
perceptions, associations and judgments, in relation to persons and things,
which agree with those of the generality of mankind, he is said to possess
common sense. On the contrary, when a particular individual differs from the
generality of persons in these respects, he is said not to have common sense, or
not to be in his senses.”
Common sense is sense, first of all. It is the empirical and pragmatic proposition
that what the eyes can see, the wits can solve.
And it is universal, not requiring special insight or effort. Thus, solving calculus equations or trading
commodities isn’t common sense whereas counting your change or clipping coupons
is. It can be intuitional, I believe, so
long as that intuition is shared by the general population and is rooted in
shared memories. “Avoid foreign entanglements”
is one such intuition. I don’t think
common sense is homespun and sometimes erroneous advice (“put butter on burns”)
or superstition (“avoid black cats”).
Rather, it is peasant cunning derived from real-life experiences.
Common sense is a valid but limited
test for a belief. It must meet a
reality check in that it is reasonably in agreement with most people and that
it has user value. Beliefs that cannot
meet this test must meet higher non-utilitarian tests to demonstrate validity. Common sense is often an impediment to
thought and truth. It is not entirely
irrational to use our inborn facility of common sense. But controlled observation and measurement
must supplement primitive data and natural experience. The reliance on common sense by itself can
lead us to enormous errors. Common sense
unchecked by logical criticism is the mother of folklore—that the earth is
fixed and the sun moves, that spirit is breath and wind is alive, that ships
would fall off the edge of the earth, that kings and slaves were the natural
order of things, and that women should remain in subjugation. Such misuse of the notion of common sense is
fallacious, being a form of the argumentum
ad populum (appeal to
popularity) fallacy.